0

Last October, the EEOC sued California Psychiatric Transitions, Inc. (CPT), a mental health rehabilitation center, for sexual harassment.  The lawsuit, which was filed in federal court under Title VII, alleged a supervisor had created a hostile working environment for several female employees over a number of years.  The EEOC took great issue with CPT’s response to internal complaints by the women, calling it “wholly inadequate.”  The response consisted of showing  an anti-harassment videotape to its employees.  Period.  According to the EEOC, not only should CPT have conducted a thorough investigation, it should have trained its workforce, “and particularly its supervisors and managers, on their responsibility to stop harassment.”  And, the training should have occurred as a matter of course, not simply as a result of a complaint.  Finally, the training should have consisted of more than a videotape.

Without a doubt, the best type of training is live, interactive training conducted by experts (such as us).  Not only do employers avail themselves of defenses in the event a harassment lawsuit ensues, they also stand a very good chance of averting such situations from arising in the first place.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • MySpace

Leave a Reply